🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive communications persisted. Originally, allegedly from a former police officer and an ex-military commander, and then from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan asserts he was summoned to the police station and instructed bluntly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

The leather artisan is part of a group opposing a high-value redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – faces bulldozed and transformed by a large business group.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," says the protester. "Yet the plan aims to destroy our community and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of this community sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and elite residences that overshadow the area. Dwellings are assembled randomly and frequently without proper sanitation, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is permeated by the suffocating smell of open sewers.

To some, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, shiny shopping centers and apartments with two toilets is a hopeful vision achieved.

"We lack adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or sewage systems and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," explains a chai seller, 56, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in 1982. "The single option is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Community Resistance

But others, including this protester, are opposing the project.

Everyone acknowledges that the slum, historically ignored as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring investment and development. Yet they fear that this initiative – lacking public consultation – could potentially convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a playground for the rich, evicting the marginalized, working-class residents who have resided there since the late 1800s.

It was these marginalized, migrant workers who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and commercial output, whose production is worth between a significant amount and a substantial sum per year, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Displacement Concerns

Of the roughly 1 million residents living in the packed sprawling zone, less than 50% will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is projected to take a significant period to accomplish. Others will be transferred to barren areas and salt plains on the far outskirts of the metropolis, potentially divide a generations-old community. Some will receive no homes at all.

People eligible to remain in Dharavi will be allocated flats in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the natural, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has supported this area for generations.

Commercial activities from clothing production to clay work and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be transferred to a designated "business area" far from homes.

Existential Threat

For residents like the leather artisan, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to reside in the slum, the project presents a survival challenge. His informal, multi-level workshop creates apparel – formal jackets, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – distributed in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

Household members dwells in the accommodations underneath and employees and garment workers – laborers from north India – also sleep there, allowing him to manage costs. Away from this community, accommodation prices are frequently tenfold as high for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

Within the official facilities nearby, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative depicts a contrasting vision for the future. Slickly dressed people mill about on cycles and electric vehicles, purchasing continental bread and breakfast items and having coffee on a patio near a restaurant and treat station. This represents a complete departure from the affordable idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that supports the neighborhood.

"This isn't development for us," explains the protester. "This constitutes an enormous property transaction that will price people out for residents to remain."

Additionally, there exists distrust of the development company. Run by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a supporter of the government head – the business group has been subject to claims of preferential treatment and questionable practices, which it disputes.

Although local authorities labels it a collaborative effort, the corporation paid a significant amount for its majority share. A case alleging that the project was questionably assigned to the business group is being considered in India's supreme court.

Continued Intimidation

After they started to publicly resist the development, protesters and community members state they have been subjected to an extended period of pressure and threats – comprising communications, explicit warnings and suggestions that opposing the initiative was equivalent to opposing national interests – by figures they assert are associated with the business conglomerate.

Included in these suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c